A comparative view of debarment and suspension of contractors in Brazil and in the USA

Cristiana Fortini, Christopher Yukins, Mariana Avelar

Resumo


This paper analyzes the main aspects of suspension and procurement debarment in U.S. law (in the federal sphere) and its parallel institutions in Brazilian law, focusing on temporary suspension from participation in tenders and ineligibility to compete for administrative contracts; full debarment; and impediment from participating in tenders and competing for administrative contracts.


Palavras-chave


government procurement; debarment; suspension of contractors; tenders and administrative contracts; Comparative Law

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


ARAÚJO, Ricardo Wagner. Fighting Corruption and Promoting Integrity in Public Procurement: a comparative study between Brazil and United States. George Washigton University. Advisor: Christopher R. Yukins. The Minerva Program, fall 2013.

ARÊDES, Sirlene Nunes. Tipicidade e discricionariedade na aplicação de penalidades contratuais. BATISTA JÚNIOR, Onofre. ARÊDES, Sirlene Nunes. MATOS, Federico Nunes. Contratos Administrativos: estudos em homenagem ao Professor Florivaldo Dutra de Araújo. Belo Horizonte: Forum, 2014.

BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Celso Antônio. Curso de Direito Administrativo. 31ª ed. São Paulo, Malheiros, 2014.

BRASIL, Law nº 10,520 of 2002 Available. Article 7º Availabe at : http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2002/L10520.htm>

BRASIL, Law nº 12,468 of August 4, 2011, article.47. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/Lei/L12462.htm

BRASIL, Law nº 8,429 of June 2, 1992. Availabe at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L8429.htm

BRASIL, Law nº 8,443 of July 16, 1992. Availabe at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L8443.htm

BRASIL, Law nº 8,666 of June 21,1993, articles 87 and 88. Available at:< https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L8666cons.htm >

CIBINIC John; NASH, Ralph C. Formation of Government Contracts. 3. ed. Washington D.C.: George Washington University Law School, Government Contracts Program, 1998.

JUSTEN FILHO, Marçal. Comentários à Lei de Licitações e Contratos Administrativos. 16.ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2014.

MANUEL, Kate. Debarment and Suspension of Government Contractors: An Overview of the Law Including Recently Enacted and Proposed Amendments. CRS Report for Congress. November 19, 2008. Available at: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34753.pdf

OECD BRAZIL INTEGRITY REVIEW – OECD. OECD Integrity Review of Brazil: Managing Risks for a Cleaner Public Service, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264119321-en.

OSÓRIO, Fábio Medina. Direito Administrativo Sancionador. 5.ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2015.

STEVENSON, Drury; WAGONER, Nicholas J. ‘FCPA Sanctions: Too Big to Debar?’. Fordham Law Review, New York, Vol. 80, issue 2, 2011.

TILLIPMAN, Jessica. A House of Cards Falls: Why ‘Too Big to Debar’ is all slogan and little substance. Fordham Law Review Res Gestae, New York, Vol. 80, No. 49, 2012.

YUKINS, Christopher R. Suspension and Debarment: reexamining the process. Public Procurement Law Review, Vol. 13, 2004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=509004




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21056/aec.v16i66.370

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Direitos autorais 2016 Cristiana Fortini, Mariana Avelar

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional.

ISSN 1516-3210 | e-ISSN 1984-4182


Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.

R. Saldanha Marinho, n. 1762, Bigorrilho, Curitiba-PR, Brasil, CEP 80730-060
Telefone: +55 41 3014-0740

E-mail: aec.revista@gmail.com

http://www.revistaaec.com