Judicial review of administrative action in the United States

Richard Albert, Anna Nikolayeva


In this article, the authors explain and evaluate the judicial review of administrative action under the United States Constitution. After discussing the birth of the administrative state, the authors introduce and analyze the forms of judicial review of administrative action as well as the origins and variable degree of judicial deference to administrative action. The authors close with a discussion on the future of judicial review of administrative action in the United States.


judicial review; administrative state; judicial deference; New Deal; United States Constitution.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)


CALLAHAN, Maureen B. Must Federal Courts Defer to Agency Interpretations of Statutes? A New Doctrinal Basis for Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, WIS. L. REV., p. 1275, 1991.

CUSHMAN, Barry. Court-Packing and Compromise. CONST. COMMENTARY, n. 1, p. 29, 2013.

ELIAS, Roni A. The Legislative History of the Administrative Procedure Act. FORDHAM ENVTL. L. REV., n. 27, p. 207, 2016.

FLETCHER, William A. The Structure of Standing. YALE L.J., n. 98, p. 221, 1988.

FRIENDLY, Henry J. “Some Kind of Hearing”. U. PA. L. REV., n.123, p. 1267-1272, 1975.

HENNING, Peter J. Gorsuch Nomination Puts Spotlight on Agency Powers. N.Y. TIMES: DEALBOOK Feb. 6, 2017. Available at: < https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/06/business/dealbook/gorsuch-nomination-puts-spotlight-on-agency-powers.html>

KEARNEY, Joseph D.; MERRILL, Thomas W. The Great Transformation of Regulated Industries Law COLUM. L. REV., n. 98, p. 1323, 1998.


LEVIN, Ronald M. The Anatomy of Chevron: Step Two Reconsidered. CHI.-KENT L. REV., n. 72, p. 1253-1254, 1997.

MCCUBBINS, Matthew D. Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies. VA. L. REV., n. 75, p. 431, 1989.

MERRILL, Thomas W. Textualism and the Future of the Chevron Doctrine. WASH. U. L.Q., n. 72, p. 351, 1994.

MERRILL, Thomas W. Capture Theory and the Courts: 1967-1983. CHI.-KENT L. REV., n. 72, p. 1039-, 1997.

METZLER, Edward L. the growth and development of administrative law. MARQ. L. REV., n.19, p. 209-211, 1935.

PIERCE JR, Richard J. Chevron and Its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions. VAND. L. REV., n. 41, p. 301, 1988.

RABIN, Robert L. Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective. STAN. L. REV., n. 38, p. 1189-1197, 1986.

RUBIN, Edward. It's Time to Make the Administrative Procedure Act Administrative. CORNELL L. REV., n. 95, p.108, 2003.

SCHWARTZ, Bernard. The Administrative Agency in Historical Perspective. IND. L. J., n. 36, p. 263, 1961.

SHEPHERD, George B. Fierce Compromise: The Administrative Procedure Act Emerges from New Deal Politics. NW. U. L. REV., n. 90, p. 1557, 1996.

STARR, Kenneth W. Judicial Review in the Post-Chevron Era. YALE J. ON REG., n. 3, p. 283, 1986.

STRAUSS, Peter L.The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch. COLUM. L. REV., n. 84, p. 573, 1984.

SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Constitutionalism After the New Deal. HARV. L. REV., n. 101, p. 421, 1987.

SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Law and Administration After Chevron. COLUM. L. REV., n. 90, p. 2071, 1990.

WILSON, James Q. The Politics of Regulation. THE POLITICS OF REGULATION, n. 357, p. 385, 1980.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21056/aec.v17i70.827


  • Não há apontamentos.

Direitos autorais 2017 Richard Albert

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.

ISSN 1516-3210 | e-ISSN 1984-4182

Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.

R. Saldanha Marinho, n. 1762, Bigorrilho, Curitiba-PR, Brasil, CEP 80730-060
Telefone: +55 41 3014-0740

E-mail: aec.revista@gmail.com